Posted by
Doctor Demex on Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:15:11 AM
Cultures must be better than others to survive. That's no
guarantee they will survive . . . only that they have a reason to try to survive.
Religions are the same way. Religions, born of perceptions of the
supernatural and refined by interaction with nature, are at the heart
of morals. Western civilization and its component cultures are
based on moral precepts based on Judeo-Christian religious values, but
Western governments these days try to function independently of any
particular religion. I say try, because although these
governments preside over robust cultures, they and their cultures begin
faltering when they maintain rules based on religious principles while
denying that the rules by which they operate have any historical
grounding in religion whatsoever.
The guiding moral principles on which the members of society agree to
operate and maintain order began with ancient religious principles, but
are kept in place today because they are still good ideas. The
question arises whether these good ideas came to man from God or
whether man discovered these rules on his own the hard way and then
made God up afterward. At this point, one wonders why man would
bother to make God up if the rules for living were already
obvious. Since not all humans learned at the same time what works
and what doesn't, perhaps God was conceived by the discoverers of the
rules as a means to persuade others to obey the rules; God would be an
all-powerful, supernatural enforcer who would be looking over one's
shoulder and punishing transgressors, if not in this life then forever
in the afterlife.
In fact, this seems to be the case in pre-Jewish or non-Jewish cultures
that actually had rational moral codes. The theory goes, though,
that God intervened through the Jews after the human race kept
stumbling, lost in the wilderness of its own logical constructs.
The United States, undisputedly the brightest light of Western
civilization over the last two centuries, agonizes the most (and the
most publicly) about acknowledging its religious roots. But some
people fear that acknowledging the relationship between man-made law
and its religious roots will mean that they will be compelled to admit
to a state-sponsored religion. That's unreasonable but
understandable given the secular revisionism of public schools, which
has caused a decline in the ability of its students and graduates to
think clearly.
In many European countries, religion has been suppressed in the
interest of perfecting governments where religion need never be
referenced, where anything supernatural has no place, where there is no
invisible hand on one's shoulder to guide him, and where only an
individual's conscience guides his behavior. A sense of some
common good or government compulsion is the only thing that keeps the
individual European's behavior in line.
In the Islamic world with the notable exception of Turkey, the idea
that one can separate church and state is illogical and
unacceptable. This is a powerful one-two punch in the gut for our
troops who fight for their own country, the greater good of
civilization, and the right to worship their own way. Muslims
fight for their country, the entire Muslim brotherhood, and directly
for a God who tells them that all people must worship Him or die, or,
rather, be killed. The doorway to Paradise opens for believers if
and only if they murder infidels. [This makes no sense to those
reared in the Western tradition, but as Pope Benedict recalled in his
Regensburg speech, the Islamic conception of Allah is that He is so
transcendent that He is not bound to act in ways that make sense to
humans.] The synergistic relationship among mosque and state and
the unification of interests of all members of the umma
makes Muslims motivated fighters. The people they are fighting for at
home are in complete solidarity with the jihadists. Muslims
permit themselves no opportunity to become morally confused.
It's sad that Western soldiers are constantly reminded that they're
putting their lives on the line for people who don't appreciate
it. This weakens the odds when G.I. Joe meets Jihad Joe.