About Me

Name: Doctor Demex
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Whose House Is This Anyway?

The typical leftist environmentalist feels guilty about being human and walks through the woods as though he's a guest in someone else's house, afraid he'll knock over a lamp.  Other plants and animals might occupy the environment, much like flowers and pets reside in our own homes.  And like our own homes, the environment has no meaning to humans other than the way it can be used by humans. 

Humans are as much a part of nature as anything else in the universe, so the environment is very much our home.  We can trash it entirely, though we have little incentive to do that, or we can keep it neat and clean, which we do most of the time.  But we "use" things like forests whether we're clearing them or just admiring their foliage.  For us humans to treat the environment as something on which we must avoid leaving our fingerprints at all costs is pointless to even try because it is impossible.  

The environment is the human's house just as much as it is a place for spotted owls, and humans have at least as much right to use the environment for their purposes as the spotted owls have for theirs.  Every creature and plant on the earth would horn in and displace humans if they could, and humans have just as much right to be here as any other living thing.  If a tree can fall on a human and kill him, why can't a human cut down the tree and do something useful with it?  

Humans who care about the spotted owl (which, I'll wager, perceives its environment differently from the way liberal environmentalists do) care not because they know any spotted owls or any good that spotted owls have done for the world, but for the way they fantasize the spotted owl's fitting into their own perception of their own environment.  Spotted owls are not necessary for human survival.  How do I know this for a fact?  I don't, but I'm reasonably sure I'll never be proven wrong on this one.  I believe it is immoral to subjugate the best interests of humans to the interests of spotted owls. And by the "interests of spotted owls" I mean of course the interests of narcissists who feel that it is more important to be able to "imagine" a spotted owl than it is to be allowed to cut down some of the owl's trees to increase the supply of housing for humans and thereby reduce the cost of housing for the two or three homeless people who are not homeless by choice.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive